19 Ashm 1931.137: Conclusion
As promised, we now will discuss how the unit sar fits into our existing System A. From Figure 21, we can see that sar is listed before ganá, thus the sar must be smaller than any of the units of ganá we have learned about previously. You may recall that the smallest unit of area in System A from the Early Dynastic period, iku ganá, was equal to 100 square ninda. This awkward gap between the units of length and units of area is filled by sar. 1 sar equals 1 square ninda. In other words, 1 sar is one hundredth of an iku ganá, or an iku ganá is 100 sar. The number of sar was specified using System S up to 50 sar, which equals 1 ubu ganá or one half of an iku ganá. The full relationship between sar and ganá, along with the the updated cuneiform symbols, is captured in Table 13.
The only other portion of Ashm 1931.137 that we have yet to discuss are that the first several entries of sar are actually fractions of 1 sar. At this point in time, System S was supplemented by a set of basic fractions accounting for the sixth parts of 1. Ashm 1931.137, however does not include one sixth.[1]
Symbol | Value |
![]() |
one third |
![]() |
one half |
![]() |
two thirds |
![]() |
five sixths |
The way an Old Babylonian metrology table is meant to be laid out is to start with the smallest possible units and then to increase by the smallest possible increments. Once the next unit is reached you then start counting using this new unit. Sometimes you might count by the smaller units one more time before incrementing up to larger steps. It is important that you not repeat equivalent amounts. Rather, you let the steps inform the reader how to convert from a smaller unit to a larger unit. For example, if we were making a metrology table for feet and inches. You would count from 1 inch up to 11 inches, and then the next amount would be 1 foot.
Activity 21. Refer to Table 13 and Figure 21 to answer the following question.
Ignoring the absence of one sixth sar, the metrology table for areas on Ashm 1931.137 contains five errors made by the scribe. Four of the errors are omissions, meaning a number that should have been listed was skipped over. One error is a duplication, meaning that two equivalent amounts are listed one after the other. Find all five errors.
- For a chronological development of fractions in Ancient Mesopotamia, see Table 3.2 in Eleanor Robson, Mathematics in Ancient Iraq: a Social History, (2008), 77 ↵